The new D&D survey has gone live and it's mostly about new settings for the game to explore. GET YOUR GREYHAWK VOTES IN NOW KIDS!
Kill the Girl; Save the Treasure; Loot the Dragon! Dyvers is the best place on the net for D&D, Greyhawk, and killing Orcs. Join the fun!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Last year I started the Best Reads of the Week series to help publicize some of my favorite blogs and to help the community as a wh... -
A couple of days ago, in the post So You Like Looking in Sacks , I was talking about +Chris Tamm of Elfmaids & Octopi 's fantast...
-
Due to the influx of spam comments on Dyvers I am closing the comments. I'm not currently doing anything with this blog, but I don'...
One vote for Greyhawk duly added!
ReplyDeleteWizards dropped the ball. Tomb of Annihilation could've made a badass Greyhawk event. Acererak, Vecna, any lich really. Wasted opportunity if they do tab gh finally.
ReplyDeleteI took the survey even though I don't run or play 5e and I'm not in anyone's focus demographic (I'll be 47 later this year so I'm too young for AARP & funeral homes but too old for everyone else.)but setting material can be used with any rules set if a GM has been in the game for any length of time. I've never understood why Wizards wants to muddle its worlds. They could keep Dark Sun, Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, Eberron, Mystarra, etc. as separate & unique settings. They have Planescape which allows for all these unique worlds along with any worlds that GMs's dream up to be connected. I was disappointed at the choices of supplemental setting materials that they were inquiring about. Arthurian legend, Grimm fairy tales & feudal Japan. Seriously? Like Chivalry & Sorcery, Pendragon, Harn & Bushido aren't games that exist and a GM could pull inspiration from. It bugged me that there wasn't an 'Other' option where someone could add the setting that they would like to see explored.
ReplyDelete